Next: 2.3 Bottom-up Approach: Ensuring
Up: 2 Management model of
Previous: 2.1 Generic Application Managed
In this step, the ``frames'' of GAMOCs have to be filled with detailed
management information, i.e. with attributes, notifications, actions
etc. This information has to address different requirements that
arise, for example, from software management and distribution on the
one hand and from the need to monitor the status of processes and
their ability to communicate with other processes etc. on the other
hand. To cope with the former problem area, we need information about
other applications (including their respective versions) that are
installed and how they have to be configured. Additionally, we have to
know some general characteristics of the underlying platform, e.g. the
release number of the operating system, available disk space etc. In
the latter case, required information includes e.g. the status of
processes, the end systems they should run on, the status of
connections etc. To define this information, we therefore have to use
a top-down approach that analyses requirements according to the
management functional areas (see e.g. (Kätker, 1996)). They stem from a
functional decomposition of the whole complex of management
activities, i.e. address the question ``What information about
resources do we need for management purposes?''. We have to choose the
appropriate GAMOCs representing these resources and map the required
information (attributes etc.) to them. Let us have a short look at two
examples:
- 1.
- Requirements imposed by software distribution and installation
can be met by adding appropriate information to GAMOCs related to
the computational viewpoint, especially to the different classes of
interfaces and binding objects. These can be instrumented to provide
information on other software (i.e., interfaces) required by the
application.
- 2.
- Information on the status of processes and of connections that
is obviously necessary for fault management can be mapped to the
GAMOCs capsule or channel, binder,
stub, respectively.
Next: 2.3 Bottom-up Approach: Ensuring
Up: 2 Management model of
Previous: 2.1 Generic Application Managed
Copyright Munich Network Management Team